More on Dietitians and Doctors

This is a follow-up to our previous post which posed a provocative question – who contributes more to your health, doctors or dietitians?
We’ve gotten insightful feedback from Joan Endyke, MS, LDN, CPT, that we’d like to share:
1. Nutrition Training in Medical School. Some med schools are incorporating more nutrition ed into their programs. This is great because currently some doctors’ “advice” regarding weight loss and food recommendations is appalling. But even with more nutrition ed in med school, unfortunately doctors do not have the time to listen to a patient and teach him how to change his food habits.
2. It takes more than a 10 minute visit…Dietitians typically spend an hour in an intro meeting with a client to be able to really pinpoint a person’s variables: Is it lack of knowledge? Emotional overeating? Poor planning? Which nutrients are in excess? Which are likely deficient?
During the next visit (another full hour) a good dietitian breaks down the findings, explain the physiological reasoning behind the recommendations (people don’t just want to be told what to eat, they want advice so they are able to make their own informed decisions & their habits are likely to last this way too). Lastly comes the tricky part – realistic food choices that match a person’s job schedule, family life, activity, income, time available, etc.
This can occur with frequent, consistent follow-up to enable one to develop and maintain the right habits with continued support and advice. All of this takes TIME as well as a skilled professional – but it is well worth it in the end.
3. Health Insurance. The CDC has made “overweight” a billable medical diagnosis. Many health insurance companies allow nutrition visits now, and dietitians are able to capture overweight clients before they develop a chronic condition. HOWEVER, some insurance companies limit individuals to 2 or 3 visits per year. This is really ineffective because these scarce visits do not provide enough face-time with a dietitian for most people to change habits.
This should be remedied. Preventive care should be generously available to all via a mandate and co-payments should be reasonable. Yet clients should also have to show they are committed and making progress to continue to use those health care dollars. This can be done with a quick assessment sent to the insurance company or family physician from the RD.
4. Personal Responsibility and Incentives. In Joan’s opinion, the consumer needs to bear more responsibility in this health care mess – you can’t just blame the health insurers and doctors.
Financial incentives targeting consumer would help shift some of this. People pay more for life insurance if they have high cholesterol or are overweight. Young or reckless drives have increased car insurance rates. Similarly, people who choose to smoke, not manage their weight, cholesterol, blood pressure, etc. should pay a higher premium. If and when they have managed those conditions, the premium should be lowered.
Or it could be a tax incentive for hitting your “health goals.” The proof could be a standard assessment signed off by an MD. There is only so much a dietitian or a doctor can do – individuals need to make the changes. But they should be allowed visits with a dietitian to help them. If they choose not to – that’s fine, it’s a free country, but others should not have to bear the burden of their likely use of greater health care dollars in the long run.
Get Fooducated:
RSS Subscription or
Email Subscription
Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate
Help us test our new food comparison tool: alpha.fooducate.com
Healthify your supermarket choices.

Recent Comments